iGeo 2010, Теренна работа — Задача 5. Geographic analysis; issues of land development
Field Work Test: Part I - Mapping Exercise. Instructions and Tasks / Analysis of a Geographical Issue. Answer Booklet. 8th International Geography Olympiad, Taipei, Taiwan, July 29 – August 4 2010 · 29 юли 2010 г.
Указания
Landcover/landuse change and conservation in Guandu
Fieldwork Test: Part I – Mapping Exercise
31 July, 2010
The theme of the Fieldwork Test is landcover/landuse change and conservation in Guandu. In the morning session (7:40am until 11:40am), students are expected to observe, record and map features that are related to this issue.
- In the file, there are index maps (source 1), a base map, (source 2), and other materials (sources 3 to 10; reference maps, short essays and photographs). Please check and report to the group leader if any of these items are missing.
- Students can use any maps to record field observations, to draw or to take notes. Important: The final map to be submitted has to be drawn on the plastic cover sheet with a base map in it. Use the markers (pen), provided by the group leaders, to complete the final version. This is the only map that will be assessed by the fieldwork jury. Write your name and team on the back of the plastic cover sheet NOW. Do not take the map out of the plastic cover sheet.
- Field observation should finish by 10:30. The file has to be returned to the Group Leader at the end of the field exercise at 11.10am. The file, except the final map from the morning, will be returned to students at the beginning of the geographical issue written test in the afternoon.
- In addition to what you have observed in the field, more information will be provided at the beginning of the geographical issue written test, and there will be 5 minutes reading time provided at the start of the test.
- In the field, we will stop at the sites marked A, B, and C on the base map (Source 2). Apart from making observations at these sites, please also make careful record of the vegetation, land use, and relief.
- In the Guandu Nature Park, please do not enter unauthorized areas. You should act responsibility at all times, and avoid dropping litter.
Условие
Geographic analysis; issues of land development. Guandu Natural Reserve is dominated by mangroves, one of three major mangrove sites at the river mouth of the Tanshui River. Some bird lovers want to clear the mangroves and to re-create a habitat for migratory shore birds. Others think the mangroves should be preserved as they are now, and it would be risky to change the law that gave protection to this area in the first place. There is also pressure to access more land for urban development.
As a city planner, with some knowledge of the area, give four arguments that you would expect to hear in a meeting about the future of the Guandu wetland. What labels would you give the various interest groups that make these arguments? To what extent are the arguments common in urban communities everywhere?
Решение
2.8 Commentary. The task required three specific types of information; (i) the identification of (at least) four arguments that might be put forward about the future of Guandu, (ii) the identification of labels for these broad sets of ideas and arguments (allowing overlap) and (iii) an assessment of the extent (or not) that the arguments are common to urban communities (with examples) . Examples of the labels that might be used for interest groups in the Guanda case are local people, industrial and residential developers, ornithologists (specific) and environmentalists (generic), legal/administrative people advocating the status quo, local and central government officers, tourist operators. Standards-based assessment was used to evaluate question four. All essays were marked by the first reader and cross checked by the second reader or supervisor. Neatness was not an assessment criteria; legibility was queried only with respect to meaning.
2.9 The essay was marked by identifying one of four bands into which the essay fell. The range was
00-12 out of 30 Requirements not achieved. Where the text was brief and the response clearly identifies one or two key interest groups. There was limited reference to the source data.
13-18 out of 30 Requirement achieved. The arguments of at least two interest groups were identified and described. The text offered some connection to the resources provided.
19-24 out of 30 Requirements achieved with excellence. The response identified at least three interest groups, recognizing their arguments and labeling them appropriately.
24-30 out of 30 Requirements achieved with excellence. The response identified at least four interest groups, sometimes recognizing several arguments and labeling them appropriately. The answer was extensive, diagrams were provided, the text made clear use of the resources provided, and incorporated more general geographical knowledge, including the identification of examples where similar contests for conservation land were encountered in urban space. Appropriate strategies for planners may be included (consultation/hearings).
The assignment of final marks from the essay was done at the end of the exercise; assessors decided if there are two or three bands within each level. There were concerns about the difficulty of assessing this activity, but the markers and supervisor resolved issues early in the process, and little moderation was required. The best answers scored very close to the top of the range, only a few answers failed to achieve the standard expected.
2. The spatial analysis and geographical commentary
2.1 The intent of guidelines was written into the classroom test, for which a series of additional resources were provided. The resources include a map that provided a “ideal” map that showed clearly the dike and floodgates. The map complemented the students own maps, which were returned to students for the exercise to avoid “double jeopardy” of a poor map in the first part of the exercise.
2.2 The answers were written on an answer book, for which indicative spaces were provided for candidates’ answers. Five minutes were allowed for reading the test, and getting familiar with the new resources provided. The time available for the test was 2 hours for English speakers and 2.5 for those for which English is a second language.
2.3 The questions required two graphics (a time line and a cross section, each worth 10% of the final fieldwork mark). The spatial analysis (changes in space through time) required an understanding of the habitat relationships within the Nature Reserve (20% of the final fieldwork mark). The geographical commentary presented a context statement and then asked students to think about planning for the lowland, to identify the groups who might want to make statements on the future use of the lowland, and to link these interest groups more generally to those that are found in many urban environments where there is competition for land use.
3. Overall assessment
The marks for the field mapping and written field work assignment were lower than expected but the range (26.8-7.6/40) was approximately the same as for the written response test (34-13/40). The component marks for most candidates were consistent; if they scored well on one item, they scored well on most and vice versa. The markers did an excellent and collegial job; only one of the five tasks required extensive moderation, and only one task required Committee approval for a change in the assessment initially agreed.
For information, neither scripts nor marks for the components of the field work will be made available, and papers will not be returned to students.
Appendix 1. The Taipei Field work Exercise
(Important note, this is an adaption of the advised Guidelines to meet the specific field context of Taipei)
Format of the exercise
The field work assignment consists of three parts: a mapping exercise, spatial issue relating to the field area, and a geographical analysis and commentary
Part 1: the mapping exercise. Part 1 will take place in the field. Skills that are required during the mapping exercise are observation, naming observed phenomena, locating the phenomena on the map, describing the phenomena in a map key, using appropriate graphic symbols, including scale and orientation statements. Students could, for instance, be provided with a base map and asked to add information to it using cartographic skills.
Part 2: the spatial analysis exercise. Part 2 will take place in the classroom where a spatial problem will be presented to participants for analysis. The problem may relate to physical and/or environmental planning. The problem will be introduced and documented for participants and the procedures and conditions for working on the problem-solving exercise will be outlined. The introduction to this exercise can be done in a number of ways: a presentation, a workshop and/or short excursions to the field area for gathering additional data.
Phase 3: geographical analysis and commentary. On the basis of the mapping exercise and spatial analysis in the area, participants have to respond to the problem presented, and explain their responses. The commentary needs to show that the participant has understood the nature of the problem and made connections between the properties/qualities of the field area and the spatial analysis they have carried out. In the commentary, the use of pictures, statistics, tables and graphs is preferred over lengthy texts.
Assessment of the exercise
The field work assignment is worth 40% of the final mark.
The field work assignment is carried out by individuals not teams.
The mapping exercise and commentary are mandatory parts of the assignment
The nature of the additional information provided is determined by the host.
The following components will be assessed
- The map of (a part of) the fieldwork area,
- The problem-solving exercise, to include spatial analysis of the problem presented,
- The visualisation of the field work area,
- The commentary on a suggested plan/strategies/activities.
Required skills for the field work exercise
- mapping skills (read, analyse, interpret and produce maps)
- inquiry and problem solving skills that underpin geographical writing (thinking and writing skills)
- graphicacy skills (produce pictures, statistics, tables and graphs)
In May – July 2009 a draft of these guidelines was sent for comment to International Board members in all countries that participated in iGeo 2008. The guidelines were formalised by the iGeo Task Force on September 15, 2009. The local organiser of iGeo 2010 in Taiwan therefore had sufficient time to design the fieldwork exercise, and all team leaders time to prepare their participants for the fieldwork and related assignments. The guidelines will be reviewed for the 2012 iGEO field work test in Cologne, and any changes will be advised.
Оригинал в Архива: 2010iGeo_FWT_all_questions.pdf · официални решения: 2010iGeo_FWT_Commentary_MarkingScheme.pdf