IPhO 2017, Експеримент — Задача 2. Parallel Dipole Line Magnetic Trap for Earthquake and Volcanic Sensing

Parallel Dipole Line Magnetic Trap for Earthquake and Volcanic Sensing · 18 юли 2017 г. · 10 т.

Внимание: Бележка към темата

The original official key prints a missing minus sign in the second expression for χ in A.9 and the impossible marking interval 22.8 < D < 22.2 cm in B.4. The original answer sheet labels division 4 as 4.0 points; the question and key give 3 points. These printed inconsistencies are preserved.

General instructions: Experimental Examination

July 18, 2017

The experimental examination lasts for 5 hours and is worth a total of 20 points.

Before the exam

  • You must not open the envelopes containing the problems before the sound signal indicating the beginning of the examination.
  • The beginning and end of the examination will be indicated by a sound signal. There will be announcements every hour indicating the elapsed time, as well as fifteen minutes before the end of the examination (before the final sound signal).

During the exam

  • Dedicated answer sheets are provided for writing your answers. Enter the observations into the appropriate tables, boxes or graphs in the corresponding answer sheet. For every problem, there are work sheets for carrying out detailed work. Be sure to always use the work sheets that belong to the problem you are currently working on (check the problem number in the header). If you have written something on any sheet which you do not want to be graded, cross it out. Only use the front side of every page. Do not forget to put your student code numbers in each working sheets or answer sheets in the field provided. Answers or working results will not be graded if there is no student code numbers written.
  • In your answers, try to be as concise as possible: use equations, logical operators and sketches to illustrate your thoughts whenever possible. Avoid the use of long sentences.
  • Explicit error calculation is not required unless explicitly asked for. However, you are asked to give an appropriate number of significant digits when stating numbers. Also, you should decide on the appropriate number of data points or measurement repetitions unless specific instructions are given.
  • You may often be able to solve later parts of a problem without having solved the previous ones.
  • You are not allowed to leave your working place without permission. If you need any assistance (need to refill your drinking water bottle, broken calculator, need to visit a restroom, etc.), please draw the attention of a supervisor by lifting one of the three flags into the air ("Refill my water bottle, please", "I need to go to the toilet, please", or "I need help, please" in all other cases).

At the end of the exam

  • At the end of the examination you must stop writing immediately.
  • For every problem, sort the corresponding sheets in the following order: questions, answer sheets, work sheets.
At the end of the exam — continued
  • For E1 (Experimental Problem No. 1) you need to enclose the millimeter block paper that has been used for making the deflactogram. Please make sure that you have written your student code numbers and the concentration of the solutions that you used on this millimeter block paper.
  • You must write the number and total number of pages used on your working sheets at the bottom of each pages.
  • Put all the sheets belonging to one problem into the same envelope. Also put the general instructions into the remaining separate envelope (if available or just put in outside the envelope if remaining separate envelope is not available). Also hand in empty sheets. You are not allowed to take any sheets of paper out of the examination area.
  • Leave your writing equipment (provided by the committee, if any) as well as the provided calculator on the experiment table.
  • Wait at your table until your envelopes and all the necessary equipment are collected. Once all envelopes and equipment are collected, your guide will escort you out of the examination area. Don’t forget to take your water bottle with you or your remaining snack.

Условие

A. Introduction

Map of Indonesia and historic disasters, pendulum seismometer diagram and volcano tiltmeter illustration.
Figure. 1 (a) Map of Indonesia showing its well-known disasters. (b) Basic seismometer to detect earthquake. (c) Tiltmeter to monitor volcano.

Indonesia is the world's largest archipelago, with about 17,000 islands sprawling in the tropics and thus often called "the jewel of the equator". Unfortunately, it has plenty of natural threats such as earthquake and volcanic eruptions. Colossal catastrophic events (Fig. 1a) such as the Sumatra-Andaman earthquake and tsunami (2004), Krakatau (1883) and Tambora (1815) volcanic eruptions are among the deadliest disasters in the recorded history of the world. To detect earthquake, we use a seismometer, usually a pendulum-based system to measure the ground displacement or acceleration (Fig. 1b). To monitor volcano, we use tiltmeter to detect a change in ground inclination due to underground magma movement (Fig. 1c). In this problem we will explore the physics and applications of a new kind of magnetic trap and sensor - called Parallel Dipole Line (PDL) trap system - for sensing earthquake and to monitor volcano.

Parallel dipole line system is an arrangement of two linear distribution of magnetic dipole (also called a dipole line) as shown in Fig. 2. Recently two Indonesian physicists discovered a very interesting effect in this system: if the length of the dipole line is longer than certain critical length the magnetic field becomes stronger on the edges which produces a "camelback potential" as shown in Fig. 2a.* This "camelback effect" is important as it enables this system to serve as a new type of magnetic trap called Parallel Dipole Line (PDL) trap. Experimentally we can realize this PDL trap using a pair of diametric magnets i.e. a cylinder magnets with magnetization along diameter as shown in Fig. 2c where the north and south poles are on the curved sides instead of the flat faces.

Four panels: camelback potential model, pair of diametric magnets, magnetic cross-section photograph and labelled x,y,z geometry.
Figure 2. (a) Parallel dipole line trap model with the camelback potential along z-direction. (b) Experimental setup using "diametric" magnets. (c) Cross section view. (d) Schematics of the PDL trap. [* Gunawan and Virgus, J. Appl. Phys. 121, 133902 (2017)].

If we drop a graphite rod (ordinary pencil lead) into the trap it will levitate or gets trapped in a stable condition. This occurs because in xx-direction the graphite is repelled by the magnets from both sides and in vertical (yy) direction the magnetic repulsion force balance the gravity making it levitates at height y0y_0 (Fig. 2d). In longitudinal direction (zz) the camelback potential holds the graphite stable.

The camelback potential of the magnetic trap serves as a one-dimensional oscillator. If you give a little perturbation along the zz-axis to the graphite rod, it will exhibit underdamped oscillation as shown in Fig. 3a. This PDL trap can be used as a sensitive seismometer. If the ground underneath shakes, the graphite rod tends to remain stable and its relative displacement (Fig. 3b) is the "earthquake" signal. Similarly, it can also be used as sensitive tiltmeter: if you tilt the trap slightly, the graphite rod will move significantly without any friction.

Damped graphite oscillation versus time with exponential envelope and ground-vibration detection time trace.
Figure 3. (a) Underdamped oscillation of a graphite rod along the camelback potential. (b) Seismometer application: Ground vibration detection by PDL trap.

We will now investigate the physics and application of this PDL trap in two sections.

Section A: Basic characteristics

(1) Determination of the magnet's magnetization MM (2.5 pt.)

(2) Magnetic levitation and magnetic susceptibility χ\chi (1.0 pt.)

(3) The camelback potential oscillation and magnetic susceptibility χ\chi (1.0 pt.)

(4) Oscillator quality factor QQ and determination of air viscosity μA\mu_A (3.0 pt.)

Section B: Applications

(5) PDL Trap Seismometer (0.5 pt.)

(6) PDL Trap Tiltmeter (2.0 pt.)

B. Apparatus

Complete experimental apparatus photograph with numbered items 1–15 and close-ups of single diametric magnet and PDL trap.
Figure 4. The experimental setup.
  1. Single diametric magnet assembly. Yellow sticker is attached to mark magnetization.
  2. The PDL magnetic trap assembly, shown with levitating graphite. Please do not remove the magnets from the assembly.
  3. Top platform with 3 screws
  4. Bottom platform
  5. Tesla meter to measure magnetic field. Batteries are provided to power up the Tesla meter and a cable to connect the Hall probe to Tesla meter.
  6. Hall sensor probe of the Tesla meter
  7. Graphite rods (pencil leads) with 4 diameter sizes HB/0.3, HB/0.5, HB/0.7, and HB/0.9. See the constants and data for exact diameters. You may need to break these graphite rods to specific lengths as required.
  8. Stopwatch
  9. Magnifying glass
  10. Tweezer, anti-static
  11. Round yellow sticker—to mark the magnetization direction (north-south pole) of single magnet
  12. "Insert-ruler" to measure graphite levitation height
  13. Toothpick to move around the graphite rod
  14. Silly putty to stick magnet assemblies to platform
  15. Ruler

INSTRUCTIONS & WARNING:

  1. Keep the single magnet and the PDL trap (double magnet) assemblies away from each other. They can hit each other and crack!
  2. Turn off the Tesla meter if not in use to save battery!
  3. Please detach items 7, 11-14 carefully from bottom platform (item 4) and then place the top platform (item 3) on the bottom platform.
  4. You can use the three screws to adjust the level of the top platform.

CONSTANTS AND DATA:

Radius of the diametric magnetRR3.2 mm
Length of the diametric magnetLL25.4 mm
Gap of the PDL trapgMg_M1.5 mm
Mass density of graphiteρ\rho1680 kg/m³
Graphite rod "HB/0.3" diameterdd0.38 mm
Graphite rod "HB/0.5" diameterdd0.56 mm
Graphite rod "HB/0.7" diameterdd0.70 mm
Graphite rod "HB/0.9" diameterdd0.90 mm
Room temperatureTT298 K
Magnetic permeability in vacuumμ0\mu_01.257×10−6 H/m1.257\times10^{-6}\ \mathrm{H/m}
Boltzmann constantkBk_B1.38064852×10−23 m2 kg/s2 K1.38064852\times10^{-23}\ \mathrm{m^2\,kg/s^2\ K}
Acceleration of gravitygg9.8 m/s²

[1] Determination of the magnet's magnetization (MM) (2.5 pt.)

C. Experiment & Questions

SECTION A. BASIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PDL TRAP

Magnet and Hall-probe schematic, near/far-field log profile and photograph showing Hall sensor, magnetization mark and ruler.
Figure 5. (a) Measuring the magnetic field. (b) Magnetic field profile (c) Setup.

The strength of the magnetic trap depends on the total magnetic dipole moment of the magnet mm. It depends on the magnetization MM which is magnetic dipole per unit volume and a characteristics of the magnetic material. For our cylindrical magnet:

M=mπR2L(1)M=\frac{m}{\pi R^2L}\qquad (1)

where RR is the radius and LL is the length of the magnet (see Constants and Data). The value of MM is considered the same for all magnets in this experiment. We will study the magnetic field profile and the determine MM of the diametric magnet used in our PDL trap.

Take the single diametric magnet assembly and setup the experiment as shown in Fig. 5c. Align the magnetization (as shown in Fig. 6a) pointing towards the Hall (magnetic field) sensor. Measure the strength of the magnetic field along the xx-axis using Tesla meter. The magnetic field profile BB in near field or "Dipole Line" limit for approximately x≤16x\leq16 mm:

BI(x)=μ0m2πxpL(2)B_I(x)=\frac{\mu_0m}{2\pi x^pL}\qquad (2)

The xx-axis is along the magnetization axis of the diametric magnet as shown in Figure 6a and xx refers to the distance from the center of diametric magnet to hall probe sensor inside the sensor chip. Please refer to issue of offset shown in Figure 6b.

We will perform measurements only in the "Near field" region:

A.1 Record zero offset (B0B_0) of the Teslameter without any magnet nearby. Subtract subsequent field measurement with this value. [0,1 т.]

A.2 Measure magnetic field BB vs. xx in the near field region (7≤x≤16 mm)(7\leq x\leq16\ \mathrm{mm})! Where xx is the position measured from the center of the magnet. Record and plot your result on the answer sheet. Follow the "HINT & DIRECTIONS" below. [1,15 т.]

A.3 Use your experimental data to determine the value of the exponent pp. [0,75 т.]

A.4 Determine the magnet's magnetization MM. [0,5 т.]

HINTS & DIRECTIONS:

Hall sensor board, magnet rotation to maximize field and actual Hall element at xOFFSET=4.0 mm.
Figure 6. Magnetic field measurement (a) Adjustment (b) Offset issue
  1. Turn off the Tesla meter if not in use to save battery!
  2. For Teslameter, wait approximately ~2 sec for each data point before taking reading.
  3. Note that xx is measured from the center of magnet. Magnet radius is R=3.2R=3.2 mm.
  4. Use recommended measurement setup in Fig. 5c.
  5. See Fig. 6a, adjust the rotation of the magnet so its magnetization is pointing to the Hall sensor thus maximizing the field. You can use the yellow round sticker to mark the magnetization direction on the magnet.
  6. When the Hall sensor touches the magnet the actual distance between the center of the magnet and the actual Hall sensor element is the offset value given as: xOFFSET=4x_{OFFSET}=4 mm
  7. Start your measurement with Hall sensor at x=5x=5 mm! Don't use the data when the sensor touches the magnet (x=4x=4 mm) as the sensor is saturated or the probe is flexing during touch.

[2] The Magnetic Levitation effect and Magnetic Susceptibility (χ\chi) (1 pt.)

Two-magnet cross section showing graphite, a, R, y0, gM, magnetization and x,y axes, alongside shaped insert ruler.
Figure 7. (a) The magnetic levitation effect in the PDL trap. (b) Insert ruler for measuring the levitation height y0y_0.

The PDL trap also demonstrates magnetic levitation effect. The graphite levitates at the center of the trap at height y0y_0 as shown in Fig. 7(a). The graphite is repelled by the magnet with a force FM(y0)F_M(y_0) that depends on the magnetic susceptibility χ\chi and the rod position y0y_0. Magnetic susceptibility describes how much a material gets magnetized in response to an applied field. It appears in relation: μ=(1+χ)μ0\mu=(1+\chi)\mu_0 where μ\mu is the magnetic permeability of the material. This magnetic repulsion force on a graphite rod in the PDL trap is given as:

FM(y0)=−μ0M2χVr2R4a5f(y0a)(3)F_M(y_0)=-\frac{\mu_0M^2\chi V_r}{2}\frac{R^4}{a^5}f\left(\frac{y_0}{a}\right)\qquad (3)

Note that when FM(y0)F_M(y_0) is positive the force is directed upwards and there is a negative sign in the formula. Here VrV_r is the volume of the graphite rod, MM is the volume magnetization of the magnet (obtained from Question 1), aa is the position of the magnet center given as: a=R+gM/2a=R+g_M/2 (see Fig. 7a) where gMg_M is the gap between magnets: gM=1.5g_M=1.5 mm. f(u)f(u) is the dimensionless function for the magnetic repulsion force in this trap given as:

f(u)=4u(3−u2)(1−u2)(1+u2)5(4)f(u)=\frac{4u(3-u^2)(1-u^2)}{(1+u^2)^5}\qquad (4)

A.5 Place gently a graphite rod HB/0.5 and length = 8 mm. Measure the levitation height y0y_0 of the rod (see Fig. 7a)! Hint: Use the insert ruler provided as shown in Fig. 7b. Press the ruler on the magnets to read the position of the graphite rod. [0,1 т.]

A.6 Use the result from part A.5 to determine the magnetic susceptibility χ\chi of the graphite rod. [0,8 т.]

A.7 What kind of magnetic material is graphite? Choose one: (i) Ferromagnetic; (ii) Paramagnetic; or (iii) Diamagnetic? [0,1 т.]

[3] The camelback potential oscillation and magnetic susceptibility (χ\chi) (1 pts)

Oscillating graphite rod above magnet and graph of camelback/parabolic magnetic potential versus z with ±L/2 and 0.
Figure 8. (a) Graphite oscillation at height y0y_0. (b) The camelback potential of the PDL trap and its parabolic approximation.

We will determine χ\chi independently using the oscillation in the magnetic "camelback potential" of the PDL trap as shown in Fig. 8. For small amplitude (z<4z<4 mm) the magnetic potential can be approximated as a parabolic (shown as dotted curve in Fig. 8b):

UM=12kzz2(5)U_M=\frac{1}{2}k_zz^2\qquad (5)

where kzk_z is the spring constant of the potential and zz is center of mass displacement of the rod. This spring constant kzk_z depends on the magnet magnetization MM (from Question 1) and χ\chi:

kz=−C1μ0χM2Vr(6)k_z=-C_1\mu_0\chi M^2V_r\qquad (6)

where μ0\mu_0 is the magnetic permeability, VrV_r is the volume of the graphite rod, C1=198.6/m2C_1=198.6/\mathrm{m^2} is a constant for this magnetic trap setup.

Drop the graphite rod at the center of the magnetic trap. Adjust the platform level with the screw knobs so that the rod stays at the center of the trap. Displace the rod with a toothpick to induce oscillation along the camelback potential.

A.8 Perform an oscillation for the "HB/0.5" graphite and l=8l=8 mm. Limit to small oscillation amplitude i.e. A<4A<4mm. Determine the oscillation period. (The oscillation will decay over time due to damping, ignore this damping effect). [0,2 т.]

A.9 Calculate the magnetic susceptibility (χ\chi) of the graphite using this oscillation. [0,8 т.]

[4] Oscillator quality factor (QQ) and estimate of air viscosity (3 pt.)

We observe that the graphite rod oscillation is damped due to the air friction and we want to understand how the friction depends on the size of the graphite rod (diameter and length) and estimate the air viscosity μA\mu_A. The motion of the rod can be modeled as underdamped oscillation: z(t)=Ae−t/τsin⁡(ωt)z(t)=Ae^{-t/\tau}\sin(\omega t) as shown in Fig. 3(a) where AA is the initial amplitude and ω=2πf\omega=2\pi f is the angular frequency and tt is time. The amplitude decays with time by a factor of exp⁡(−t/τ)\exp(-t/\tau) where τ\tau is the damping time constant. This determines the oscillator "quality factor" defined as: Q=ωτ/2Q=\omega\tau/2. If Q>0.5Q>0.5 the oscillation is underdamped, Q=0.5Q=0.5 is critically damped and Q<0.5Q<0.5 is overdamped. This quality factor is important for designing PDL trap as seismometer or tiltmeter sensors.

We can calculate the damping time constant τ\tau by approximating the cylinder rods as long ellipsoid and calculate the Stokes drag force. The damping time constant is given as:

τ=23ρr2μAln⁡(0.607×lr)(7)\tau=\frac{2}{3}\frac{\rho r^2}{\mu_A}\ln\left(0.607\times\frac{l}{r}\right)\qquad (7)

where ρ\rho, rr and ll are the mass density, radius and length of the graphite rod and μA\mu_A is the viscosity of the air. We want to estimate the air viscosity using this model.

A.10 We need to determine the damping time constant of the oscillation τ\tau. Sketch how you measure τ\tau in a simple way. [0,5 т.]

A.11 Perform oscillation damping experiments with a group of rods with various diameters and fixed length of 8 mm. Determine the damping time constant τ\tau for each rods. [1,5 т.]

A.12 Determine the air viscosity μA\mu_A. [1 т.]

[5] PDL Trap Seismometer (0.5 pt.)

SECTION B. SENSOR APPLICATIONS

Imagine you are designing seismometer using this PDL magnetic trap. For seismometer application we want very high sensitivity or very low acceleration "noise floor" i.e. the lowest acceleration that it can detect. This acceleration noise floor is given as (in unit of m/(s2 Hz0.5)\mathrm{m/(s^2\,Hz^{0.5})}):

an=4kBTωQmR(8)a_n=\sqrt{\frac{4k_BT\omega}{Qm_R}}\qquad (8)

where kBk_B is the Boltzmann constant, TT is the temperature (see Constants and Data), and mRm_R is the mass of the rod, all are in SI units. In Question 4 you have measured τ\tau of several graphite diameters. Pick one that you think will serve as the best seismometer.

B.1 Which diameter of rod do you choose? [0,2 т.]

B.2 Calculate the seismometer acceleration noise floor (ana_n) for the rod of your choice. [0,3 т.]

[6] PDL Trap Tiltmeter (2 pt.)

Tilted two-platform PDL trap, graphite displacement Δz, center, screw rotation, distance D and tilt angle θ.
Figure 9. PDL trap system as tiltmeter

We will investigate the PDL trap as a very sensitive tiltmeter to monitor volcano. The change in the ground inclination is simulated by turning the screw and we want to determine the screw thread size SS where SS is the change of height per unit turn. We show that by measuring displacement of the graphite rod in the trap we can measure the inclination (tilt) precisely.

Use pencil rod HB/0.5 and length l=8l=8 mm in this experiment. Start from the center position. Assume the camelback potential can be approximated as harmonic potential like in problem 3:

B.3 Derive the relation theoretically between displacement Δz\Delta z with the screw thread size SS and the number of turns (N)(N). [0,5 т.]

B.4 By turning the screw slowly, determine the rod displacement Δz\Delta z vs. the number of screw turns (N)(N). Determine the thread size SS. [1,25 т.]

B.5 When the ground tilt changes we want the graphite rod to go to equilibrium as fast as possible (instead of sustaining very long oscillation) to allow easy reading. What is the ideal QQ factor for a tiltmeter? [0,25 т.]

AE2 — Parallel Dipole Line Magnetic Trap for Earthquake & Volcanic Sensing (10 points)

Student Code

A. BASIC CHARACTERISTICS OF PDL TRAP

1. Determination of the magnet's magnetization (MM) (2.5 pt.)

Question — Answer — Marks

A.1 — 0.1 pt.

Record zero offset (B0B_0) of the Teslameter without any magnet nearby. Subtract subsequent field measurement with this value.

B0=B_0=

A.2 — 1.15 pt.

Measure magnetic field BB vs. xx in the near field region (7≤x≤16 mm)(7\leq x\leq16\ \mathrm{mm})! Where xx is the position measured from the center of the magnet. Record and plot your result on the answer sheet.

Original blank graph paper for the AE2 A.2 magnetic-field measurement response.

A.3 — 0.75 pt.

Use your experimental data to determine the value of the exponent pp.

p=p=

A.4 — 0.5 pt.

Determine the magnet's magnetization MM.

M=M=

2. The Magnetic Levitation effect and Magnetic Susceptibility (ξ\xi) (1.0 pt.)

Question — Answer — Marks

A.5 — 0.1 pt.

Place gently a graphite rod HB/0.5 and length = 8 mm in the trap. Measure the levitation height y0y_0 of the rod (see Fig. 7a)! Hint: Use the insert ruler provided as shown in Fig. 7b. Press the ruler on the magnets to read the position of the graphite rod.

y0=y_0=

A.6 — 0.8 pt.

Use the result from part A.5 to determine the magnetic susceptibility χ\chi of the graphite rod.

χ=\chi=

A.7 — 0.1 pt.

What kind of magnetic material is graphite? Choose one: (i) Ferromagnetic; (ii) Paramagnetic; or (iii) Diamagnetic?

3. The camelback potential oscillation and magnetic susceptibility (χ\chi)

Question — Answer — Marks

A.8 — 0.2 pt.

Perform an oscillation for the "HB/0.5" graphite and l=8l=8 mm. Limit to small oscillation amplitude i.e. A<4A<4mm. Determine the oscillation period. (The oscillation will decay over time due to damping, ignore this damping effect).

A.9 — 0.8 pt.

Calculate the magnetic susceptibility (χ\chi) of the graphite using this oscillation.

χ=\chi=

4. Oscillator quality factor (QQ) and estimate of air viscosity μA\mu_A (4.0 points)

Question — Answer — Marks

A.10 — 0.5 pt.

We need to determine the damping time constant of the oscillation τ\tau. Sketch how you measure τ\tau in a simple way!

A.11 — 1.5 pt.

Perform oscillation damping experiments with a group of rods with various diameters and fixed length of 8 mm. Determine the damping time constant τ\tau for each rods

A.12 — 1 pt.

Determine the air viscosity μA\mu_A.

μA=\mu_A=

B. SENSOR APPLICATION OF THE PDL TRAP

5. PDL Trap Seismometer (0.5 pt.)

Question — Answer — Marks

B.1 — 0.2 pt.

Which diameter of rod do you choose?

B.2 — 0.3 pt.

Calculate the seismometer acceleration noise floor (ana_n) for the rod of your choice.

6. PDL Trap Tiltmeter (2 pt.)

Question — Answer — Marks

B.3 — 0.5 pt.

Derive the relation theoretically between displacement Δz\Delta z with the screw thread size SS and the number of turns (N)(N).

B.4 — 1.25 pt.

By turning the screw slowly, determine the rod displacement Δz\Delta z vs. the number of screw turns (N)(N). Determine the thread size SS.

S=S=

B.5 — 0.25 pt.

When the ground tilt changes we want the graphite rod to go to equilibrium as fast as possible (instead of sustaining very long oscillation) to allow easy reading. What is the ideal QQ factor for a tiltmeter?

Q=Q=

Отговори

Решение

Теми и трудност

Оценена трудност: 4/5.

Магнетизъм и индукция · Механика · Флуиди · Магнитно поле · Механични трептения · Вискозитет и съпротивление

Предпоставки: Гимназиална подготовка, Разширена олимпиадна подготовка


Оригинал в Архива: exp2.pdf · официални решения: exp2_sol.pdf · допълнителни данни: exp2_anssheet.pdf · допълнителни данни: exp_instructions.pdf