iGeo 2006, Теренна работа — Задача 6. Question 6
6th International Geography Olympiad, Brisbane, Australia. Fieldwork Test · 30 юни 2006 г. · 13 т.
Fieldwork Test. Part A — Question Booklet
Friday 30 June 2.00 - 3.15pm
You may have with you stationery items, a calculator, a language dictionary, and your annotated map and notes from this morning’s fieldwork.
Answer the questions in the answer booklet provided
Fieldwork Test. Part B — Question Booklet
Saturday 1 July 9.00 - 10.30am
You may have with you stationery items, a calculator, a language dictionary, your Answer Booklet from Part A, the aerial photo distributed during the fieldwork, your annotated map and notes from this morning’s fieldwork.
Answer the questions in the answer booklet provided
(Question 1 and 2 were in Part A)
Условие
(13 marks - approximately 250 words, in paragraphs)
Which proposal do you consider to be the most appropriate? Justify your decision in a well-structured response, referring to your evaluations presented in the matrix.
Решение
Question 6 - Decision Making - 13 Marks
There is no one correct answer – any of the 3 options could be chosen by a student as the better option. What is important is how the student argues for the option they have chosen – the justification that they mount for it.
| Response Characteristics | Marks |
|---|---|
| Excellent: | |
| States preferred development proposal | 1 |
| Indicates how the chosen development meets the criteria - gives at least 3 points of justification with 2 points per criterion | 6 |
| Indicates how the development proposals are less suitable - gives at least 4 points and mentions both proposals | 4 |
| Makes mention of the | |
| age-sex pyramid | 1 |
| the land use map | 1 |
| Good: | |
| States preferred development proposal | 1 |
| Indicates how the chosen development meets most of the criteria - gives at least 3 points of justification with 2 criteria with 2 points | 5 |
| Indicates how the other development proposals are less suitable - gives 3 points | 3 |
| Makes mention of the | |
| age-sex pyramid | 1 |
| land use map | 1 |
| Satisfactory: | |
| States preferred development proposal | 1 |
| Indicates superficially how the chosen development meets most of the criteria - makes 4 points | 4 |
| Limited reference to other proposals | 2 |
| Limited mentions of age sex pyramid and land use map | 1 |
| Poor: | |
| States preferred development proposal | 1 |
| Inappropriate justification of the decision (using the criteria or otherwise) | 3 |
| Some reference to other proposals but extraneous or irrelevant | 1 |
| No reference to the age-sex pyramid or land use map | 0 |
Оригинал в Архива: 2006FWtest.pdf · официални решения: 2006FWmarkingscheme.pdf