IOAA 2022, Анализ на данни — Задача 1. Gravitational wave astronomy

International Olympiad on Astronomy and Astrophysics 2022 Georgia — Data Analysis · 18 август 2022 г. · 45 т.

Условие

In this problem, we will analyze frequency vs time representations of data containing the gravitational-wave event GW170817, which was the first observation by LIGO of a merger of a binary neutron star system.

Time–frequency spectrogram labelled LIGO-Livingston: Frequency (Hz) on a logarithmic axis with ticks 50, 100, 500 versus Time (seconds) from -30 to 0; a colour bar of Normalized amplitude from 0 to 6; a bright chirp track rises from about 40 Hz at -20 s to above 100 Hz near 0 s.

1.1 Data from the graph

(1.1.1) You are given semi-logarithmic graph, from which you need to extract values of frequency and time. Let bottom left corner be origin (0,0), horizontal coordinate xx is measured in centimeters, find a linear expression to obtain actual time tt from xx. [2 т.]

(1.1.2) Similarly, find an expression for the frequency ff as a function of the vertical coordinate yy measured in centimeters. [3 т.]

(1.1.3) Extract 14 values of time and corresponding frequency from the given graph into a table. At least one of the values should correspond to a frequency more than 100 Hz100\,\mathrm{Hz}. [7 т.]

1.2 Calculate system parameters

The most plausible explanation for this evolution of frequency is the in-spiralling of two orbiting masses, m1m_1 and m2m_2, due to gravitational-wave emission. At the lower frequencies, such evolution is characterized by the “chirp mass”

Mchirp=(m1m2)3/5(m1+m2)1/5=c3G[596π−8/3f−11/3f˙]3/5M_{chirp} = \frac{(m_1 m_2)^{3/5}}{(m_1 + m_2)^{1/5}} = \frac{c^3}{G}\left[\frac{5}{96}\pi^{-8/3} f^{-11/3}\dot{f}\right]^{3/5}

where ff and f˙\dot{f} are the observed frequency and its rate of change with respect to time and GG and cc are the gravitational constant and speed of light.

(1.2.1) From the equation above, derive an expression for the frequency dependence on time.

Note: If xnx˙=kx^n\dot{x} = k, then xn+1(n+1)=kt+C\frac{x^{n+1}}{(n+1)} = kt + C, where kk, nn and CC are constants. [3 т.]

(1.2.2) By plotting the appropriate graph, find the chirp mass and estimate its error caused by uncertainty in slope calculation. [22 т.]

We realise that what is measured by the ground-based GW detectors are actually the detector-frame masses, which are related to the source frame masses by

mdetector=(1+z)mm_{\mathrm{detector}} = (1+z)m

where zz is the redshift of the binary.

(1.2.3) If the host galaxy NGC 4993 has a redshift z=0.009783z = 0.009783, find the source frame chirp mass. [2 т.]

(1.2.4) The mass ratio q=m1/m2q = m_1/m_2, is much harder to measure. Advanced waveform analysis shows that qq for this system was in the range of 0.73 to 1.0. Calculate range of values for the masses m1m_1 (primary) and m2m_2 (secondary). [6 т.]

Combined original · 1 Data from the graph

Additional original source: Data Analysis Problems & Solutions.pdf. This source has different wording, requests, figures and scoring. Its complete version is retained below; the dated question and matching solution version above stays unchanged. No chronology is printed on this combined source.

Source note. The combined original prints the distance request as 3 points but its key as 2.0. Its uncertainty, sign and mass-subscript discrepancies are retained as printed.

In this problem, we will analyze Time-frequency representations of data containing the gravitational-wave event GW170817, Which was the first observation by LIGO of a merger of a binary neutron star system.

LIGO-Livingston normalized amplitude, frequency and time spectrogram

(1.1) You are given semi-logarithmic graph, from which you need to extract values of frequency and time. Find a linear expression to obtain actual time tt from the measured horizontal axis coordinate xx. [2 т.]

(1.2) Similarly, find an expression for the frequency ff as a function of the measured coordinate yy. [3 т.]

(1.3) Using the relations that you obtained, extract at least 12 values of time and corresponding frequency from the given graph. At least one of the values should correspond to a frequency more than 100 Hz. [6 т.]

Combined original · 2 Calculate system parameters

The most plausible explanation for this evolution of frequency is the in-spiralling of two orbiting masses, m1m_1 and m2m_2, due to gravitational-wave emission. At the lower frequencies, such evolution is characterized by the chirp mass

Mchirp=(m1m2)3/5(m1+m2)1/5=c3G[596π−8/3f−11/3f˙]3/5M_{chirp}=\frac{(m_1m_2)^{3/5}}{(m_1+m_2)^{1/5}}=\frac{c^3}{G}\left[\frac5{96}\pi^{-8/3}f^{-11/3}\dot f\right]^{3/5}

where ff and f˙\dot f are the observed frequency and its time derivative and GG and cc are the gravitational constant and speed of light.

(2.1) Linearize the equation given above and obtain the frequency dependence on time.

Note: If xnx˙=kx^n\dot x=k, then xn+1(n+1)=kt+C\frac{x^{n+1}}{(n+1)}=kt+C, where kk, nn and CC are all some constants. [3 т.]

(2.2) Find chirp mass in terms of solar masses and its uncertainty, by using a millimeter paper. [15 т.]

We realise that what is measured by the ground-based GW detectors is actually the detector-frame masses, which are related to the source frame masses by

mdetector=(1+z)mm_{detector}=(1+z)m

where zz is the redshift of the binary.

(2.3) It is known that host galaxy NGC 4993 has a red shift z=0.009783z=0.009783, find the source frame chirp mass. [2 т.]

(2.4) Find distance to the NGC 4993. [3 т.]

(2.5) The mass ratio q=m1/m2q=m_1/m_2, is much harder to measure. Advanced waveform analysis shows that qq for this system was in the range of 0.73 to 1.0. Calculate range of values for the masses m1m_1 (primary) and m2m_2 (secondary). [6 т.]

Combined original · 3 Speed of the gravitational wave

Gamma-ray burst GRB 170817A was observed by the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor to be almost simultaneous with gravitational wave event. The same neutron star merger was identified as the source of the signal. In the table below, the first column is time since the arrival of the gravitational wave peak, which happened on 2017 August 17 at 12:41:04 UTC. This peak symbolized the start of the merger of the neutron stars. The second column gives detector counts as measured in Fermi GBM. Background is already subtracted from the signal.

t(s)event count (/s)
0.598115
0.7975-62
0.99689
1.1962-24
1.395624
1.5949-50
1.79430
1.993718
2.193053
2.3924179
2.5918176
2.791191
2.990526
3.189971
3.389238
3.588659
3.788021

(3.1) Plot event count over time on a millimeter paper. [6 т.]

(3.2) Estimate the delay Δt\Delta t between start of the merger and start of the Gamma-ray Burst. [1 т.]

From this measurement it is possible to determine what is called the fractional speed difference during the trip.

ΔvvEM=vGW−vEMvEM\frac{\Delta v}{v_{EM}}=\frac{v_{GW}-v_{EM}}{v_{EM}}

(3.3) Express this quantity in terms of Δt\Delta t and distance to the source DD. [1 т.]

(3.4) If we conservatively assume that the peak of the gravitational wave signal and the first GRB photons were emitted simultaneously, thus attributing the entire lag to faster travel by the gravitational wave signal, this time difference provides an upper bound on Δv\Delta v. Calculate this upper bound. [1 т.]

(3.5) To obtain a lower bound on Δv\Delta v, one can assume that the two signals were emitted at times differing by more than Δt\Delta t, with the faster EM signal making up some of the difference. Take maximum time delay as 10s and find lower bound. [1 т.]

Отговори

Решение


Оригинал в Архива: IOAA-Data.pdf · официални решения: Data_Solution.pdf · допълнителни данни: Data Analysis Problems & Solutions.pdf